Linux vs Windows 7
|
01-25-2010, 04:11 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Linux vs Windows 7
Windows 7
* Better at synthetic benchmarks. * Faster transfer of large files. * Final version likely to improve. * Suspend/resume works! * Desktop search is well implemented and can go online. * Media libraries can be pinned to the start menu and task bar. * Jump lists can genuinely help improve efficiency. * Starter: No Aero and no 64-bit. * Home Basic: Developed for emerging markets. * Home Premium: Standard edition including Aero and touch. * Professional: Adds remote desktop and encrypted filesystem. * Enterprise: Unix application support and volume licensing. * Ultimate: As with enterprise, but for individual users. Linux * Faster booting. * Less memory usage. * Smaller install size. * Broader hardware compatibility. * Nepomuk blurs the border between local and online. * Gnome Do replaces the task bar entirely. * Google's Desktop widgets now on Gnome and KDE. * Starter: No Linux is this restrictive. * Home Basic: Crunchbang or Ubuntu. * Home Premium: For eye candy, try Mint or Kubuntu. * Professional: Fedora offers encryption as an installation option. * Enterprise: OpenSUSE should work well with Windows. * Ultimate: No matter which Linux you choose, there's no restrictions. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)